Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 01:15:30 08/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2003 at 17:33:57, Uri Blass wrote: >We can only say that we did not see a proof that Noomens book is superior. That is true. It's hard to draw a conclusion from those games. The book doesn't make hundreds of points of difference and the programs aren't all that far apart either. I agree with you on that. So whoever wins has a lot to do with luck. You used the word 'evidence' earlier but that's severely misplaced. It becomes evidence when it's statistically significant. Before that, I wouldn't put any faith in it. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.