Author: Mridul Muralidharan
Date: 10:38:54 10/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
Hi, I was a bit taken aback by these declarations : On October 03, 2003 at 12:47:23, Uri Blass wrote: >I prefer even not to care about using hash tables for pruning because my >experience told me that I cannot get significant gain there easily Hash table not giving you pruning ? I suspect a bug in your hashkey - nothingelse. Or maybe it is the easily that is operative word ? I think there are a lot of open source programs that you can refer to and correct your bugs with - crafty , GNUChess , etc , etc. Might help to get this right. >(I have a lot >of stuff that means that pruning or extension is not defined only by the >position). Where ever possible , I try to make the search behaviour as relevent to the current position as possible and not rely on past search. Why do you want to do the opposite ? Wont you not end up with heavy instability problems ? Regards Mridul > >Uri
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.