Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 04:02:42 11/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 1998 at 06:05:18, Mark Young wrote: >On November 07, 1998 at 05:30:46, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>If you reread my comment, you wil notice I said that endings is the "weaker" >>side of Rebel > >I know thats what you said, And I'm saying how many games did it take for you to >lable Rebel 10 as "weaker" then Hiarcs 7 and Genius 5 in the endgame. I just >want to know how much data you based this jugdement on. I am not saying your >wrong.. I don't know. I just want to know how sure your judgement is. I think Rebel 10 has a better middlegame than Rebel 8/9, which is saying a real lot, but basically the same endings. Assuming this is true, and I am quite convinced it is, then I had 2 years to compare Rebel endings with Genius and Hiarcs. Both stronger. In the match R10-H7b, Hiarcs won 5 games in the endgame, some of them dead even in the beginning. Look, H7b "knows" a few things in the endgame that no other commercial programs except Genius know. >>> it seems stronger then Fritz 5, but only a >>>bit stronger.(after 21 games Junior 5 is only +1 over Fritz 5.} >> >>I don't think you can estimate strength after one single match. > >I'm not sure what you mean here. I was only referring to your paragraph above. I had the impression that you estimated Junior's strength after its match against Fritz 5. > I played and posted many matches with Fritz 5. >I know how strong this program is. I just don't play all the programs before >posting the results as you did here. And I see other Junior 5 results on here >and in other places, So I got a good feel how well Junior 5 plays. I understand you better now. And yes, Junior 5 is very, very strong. Amir said that J5 should be about 50 Elo points stronger than J4.6. In my opinion this is too conservative. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.