Author: Mark Young
Date: 19:21:22 11/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2003 at 19:45:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 16, 2003 at 19:23:14, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 16, 2003 at 19:12:42, rait wrote: >> >>>got wrong-wery closed (not suiteble) opening variation and then had no good >>>strategy if any... >> >>I will ask the question in a different way. >> >>What is the move that changed the theoretical result of the game from draw to >>win for kasparov? >> >>I think that the answer is going to be we do not know because unfortunately or >>firtunately we did not solve chess. >> >>Uri > >I can think of a couple. the early a6. The f4 move that really crystallized >the pawn structure. Pushing a5 isolating that pawn. Once the pawn structure >was defined, it became imperative that black advance on the kingside as white >owned the queen-side. Black fiddled while Rome burned. You are correct. A very bad sideline to play, Fritz was positionally lost it seems out of book or very close to being lost. I have 9..Qc7 as the last book move and the position is very poor for black. You can get away with playing sidelines as white and still have a good position, but with black you can have your head handed to you on a silver platter as Fritz found out.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.