Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 16:45:47 11/16/03

Go up one level in this thread

On November 16, 2003 at 19:23:14, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 16, 2003 at 19:12:42, rait wrote:
>
>>got wrong-wery closed (not suiteble) opening variation and then had no good
>>strategy if any...
>
>I will ask the question in a different way.
>
>What is the move that changed the theoretical result of the game from draw to
>win for kasparov?
>
>I think that the answer is going to be we do not know because unfortunately or
>firtunately we did not solve chess.
>
>Uri

I can think of a couple.  the early a6.  The f4 move that really crystallized
the pawn structure.  Pushing a5 isolating that pawn.  Once the pawn structure
was defined, it became imperative that black advance on the kingside as white
owned the queen-side.  Black fiddled while Rome burned.

• Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) martin fierz 01:40:44 11/17/03
  • Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Robert Hyatt 06:29:12 11/17/03
  • Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Djordje Vidanovic 03:55:48 11/17/03
    • Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) martin fierz 04:31:48 11/17/03
  • Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Francesco Di Tolla 03:17:24 11/17/03
    • Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Robert Hyatt 06:29:46 11/17/03
• Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Mike Byrne 19:39:52 11/16/03
• Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Mark Young 19:21:22 11/16/03
  • Re: Where did Fritz go wrong? (NT) Comp eval out of book. Mark Young 19:37:13 11/16/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.