Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 11:59:23 11/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2003 at 06:42:01, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >> >>9...cxb5 is just awful and completely losing. > >could you support yuor statement with some further argument? 10.Bxb5 exd4 (e4 11.Ne5 Be7 12.Ba3 +-) 11. exd4 Be7 12. O-O O-O 13. Bf4 +- [D] r1bq1rk1/1p1nbppp/5n2/pBPp4/Q2P1B2/2N2N2/P4PPP/R4RK1 b - - 0 13 b7,d5 pawns and b6,b5 squares are very weak. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.