Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 23:27:35 12/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2003 at 15:54:45, Tord Romstad wrote: >On December 03, 2003 at 14:59:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>=====================10 seconds per position======================== >>test results summary: >> >>total positions searched.......... 300 >>number right...................... 299 > >That's really impressive, even considering the fast hardware. The last >time I tried, I got 289/300 at 1 second/position, 293/300 at 3 seconds, >294/300 at 5 seconds, 295/300 at 10 seconds, and 298/300 at 20 seconds. > >The remaining two positions, number 100 and 230, are *never* solved. >I can let my program analyse for hours, but it still doesn't find >the solutions. In both positions, it thinks it is winning, but >never finds the right moves. > >In number 100, Gothmog switches back and forth between Be3 and Kb3, both >with a score around +4. In number 230, it plays Rh7 with a score around >+3.3. Hiarcs 9,5 best moves after 8h of thinking on an AMD barton 2800+ : WAC.230 2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 9: 1. -+ (-1.82): 1...Th7 2.Tb1 a4 3.Fa3 Th5 4.f4 2. -+ (-1.82): 1...a4 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 3. -+ (-1.82): 1...Tf7 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 a4 5.Ta1 Fb7 6.Fb2 Rb5 7.Te1 Th8 8.Rg2 4. -+ (-1.82): 1...Tg7 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 a4 5.Ta1 Fb7 6.Fb2 Rb5 7.Te1 Th8 8.Rg2 5. -+ (-1.82): 1...Td7 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 a4 5.Ta1 Fb7 6.Fb2 Rb5 7.Te1 Th8 8.Rg2 > >What tricks do you use which helps you solve WAC100 and/or WAC230? > >And, I *REALLY* hope you're *NOT* planning to use that machine at CCT6, >because I'm probably going to be there with my PIV 2.4 GHz, searching >less than 200 kn/s ... :-) > >Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.