Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 09:22:01 12/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2003 at 02:27:35, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On December 03, 2003 at 15:54:45, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On December 03, 2003 at 14:59:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>=====================10 seconds per position======================== >>>test results summary: >>> >>>total positions searched.......... 300 >>>number right...................... 299 >> >>That's really impressive, even considering the fast hardware. The last >>time I tried, I got 289/300 at 1 second/position, 293/300 at 3 seconds, >>294/300 at 5 seconds, 295/300 at 10 seconds, and 298/300 at 20 seconds. >> >>The remaining two positions, number 100 and 230, are *never* solved. >>I can let my program analyse for hours, but it still doesn't find >>the solutions. In both positions, it thinks it is winning, but >>never finds the right moves. >> >>In number 100, Gothmog switches back and forth between Be3 and Kb3, both >>with a score around +4. In number 230, it plays Rh7 with a score around >>+3.3. > >Hiarcs 9,5 best moves after 8h of thinking on an AMD barton 2800+ : >WAC.230 >2b5/1r6/2kBp1p1/p2pP1P1/2pP4/1pP3K1/1R3P2/8 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Hiarcs 9: > >1. -+ (-1.82): 1...Th7 2.Tb1 a4 3.Fa3 Th5 4.f4 >2. -+ (-1.82): 1...a4 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 >3. -+ (-1.82): 1...Tf7 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 a4 5.Ta1 Fb7 6.Fb2 Rb5 7.Te1 Th8 >8.Rg2 >4. -+ (-1.82): 1...Tg7 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 a4 5.Ta1 Fb7 6.Fb2 Rb5 7.Te1 Th8 >8.Rg2 >5. -+ (-1.82): 1...Td7 2.Fa3 Th7 3.Tb1 Th5 4.f4 a4 5.Ta1 Fb7 6.Fb2 Rb5 7.Te1 Th8 >8.Rg2 > moves 1...Rb4 2.Cxb4 a4 played analysis after 10h, searching only THE best move, Hiarcs 9 don't find a winning sequence !! Is Rb4 really winning ??? [d]2b5/8/2kBp1p1/3pP1P1/pPpP4/1p4K1/1R3P2/8 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 9: 3.Rf4 c3 +- (1.88) Profondeur: 1/2 00:00:00 3.Rf4 c3 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 2/3 00:00:00 3.Rf4 c3 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 2/3 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 ³ (-0.49) Profondeur: 2/3 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 ± (0.96) Profondeur: 2/3 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 ± (0.74) Profondeur: 3/4 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 = (0.18) Profondeur: 4/5 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 = (0.18) Profondeur: 4/5 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 = (-0.08) Profondeur: 5/7 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 5/7 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 µ (-1.17) Profondeur: 6/14 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 µ (-1.17) Profondeur: 6/14 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 7/14 00:00:00 3.b5+ Rd7 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 7/14 00:00:00 1kN 3.b5+ Rd7 µ (-1.17) Profondeur: 8/17 00:00:00 2kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 µ (-1.17) Profondeur: 8/18 00:00:00 3kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 9/18 00:00:00 3kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 9/18 00:00:00 5kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 10/18 00:00:00 8kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 11/18 00:00:00 15kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 12/19 00:00:00 30kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 -+ (-1.46) Profondeur: 13/26 00:00:01 491kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 Rxd4 7.f3 Fa6 8.Tb2 c2 -+ (-1.65) Profondeur: 14/36 00:00:55 17715kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 4.Tb1 c3 5.Fa3 Rc4 6.Rf4 Rxd4 7.Th1 Rd3 8.Tb1 -+ (-1.74) Profondeur: 15/40 00:03:18 63121kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.82) Profondeur: 16/43 00:10:18 201292kN 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.82) Profondeur: 17/44 00:36:44 706477kN, tb=4 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.82) Profondeur: 18/49 01:37:44 1930751kN, tb=13 3.b5+ Rxb5 -+ (-1.82) Profondeur: 19/51 04:43:24 5639009kN, tb=88 > >> >>What tricks do you use which helps you solve WAC100 and/or WAC230? >> >>And, I *REALLY* hope you're *NOT* planning to use that machine at CCT6, >>because I'm probably going to be there with my PIV 2.4 GHz, searching >>less than 200 kn/s ... :-) >> >>Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.