Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 00:36:14 01/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2004 at 00:55:18, Paul Doire wrote: > Has everyone found using the UCI import in Fritz 8 to be much better than the >old winboard chessbase adapter. Is it safe to say UCI engines will run just as >strongly in Fritz 8 Gui as they do in say the Arena Gui....another words no >appreciable loss of strength. > >Is the Chessbase Gui "the place" to run matches now without the heavy prejudice >the old winboard adapter had towards chessbase products? Is it neutral? > >Thanks >Paul Hi Paul, you seem to have missed all the discussions about ChessBase GUIs sometimes allocating only 1 MB Hash for UCI engines, while native engines use the full Hash size defined in GUI. I have told my UCI engine that if a GUI tells it to allocate 1 MB Hash as in ChessBase style of cheating, then the engine should "laugh out loud" and use the Hash size defined in engine's ini file. UCI GUIs that don't stealthily limit Hash size to 1 MB are Arena, ChessPartner and maybe Shredder Classic. /Matthias.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.