Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 05:26:52 01/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2004 at 03:36:14, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >On January 12, 2004 at 00:55:18, Paul Doire wrote: > >> Has everyone found using the UCI import in Fritz 8 to be much better than the >>old winboard chessbase adapter. Is it safe to say UCI engines will run just as >>strongly in Fritz 8 Gui as they do in say the Arena Gui....another words no >>appreciable loss of strength. >> >>Is the Chessbase Gui "the place" to run matches now without the heavy prejudice >>the old winboard adapter had towards chessbase products? Is it neutral? >> >>Thanks >>Paul > > >Hi Paul, > >you seem to have missed all the discussions about ChessBase GUIs sometimes >allocating only 1 MB Hash for UCI engines, while native engines use the full >Hash size defined in GUI. > >I have told my UCI engine that if a GUI tells it to allocate 1 MB Hash as in >ChessBase style of cheating, then the engine should "laugh out loud" >and use the Hash size defined in engine's ini file. > >UCI GUIs that don't stealthily limit Hash size to 1 MB are Arena, ChessPartner >and maybe Shredder Classic. > >/Matthias. Two questions: Have you studied this yourself and seen the allocation command? Is it exactly 1MB that CB allocates? /Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.