Author: Harald Faber
Date: 15:10:44 01/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2004 at 12:45:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 17, 2004 at 07:59:09, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On January 17, 2004 at 06:07:33, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On January 16, 2004 at 19:06:21, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>[D]2r1k1b1/pp4Q1/3p4/q5p1/4P3/1PN2P2/PP6/1K5R b - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>Analysis by Shredder 8: >>>> >>>>1. +- (#153): 33...Lf7 34.Th8+ Ke7 35.Txc8 d5 36.Sxd5+ Kd6 37.Dxf7 De1+ 38.Tc1 >>>>Dc3 39.bxc3 b5 40.Dxa7 Kc6 41.Dc7# >>>>2. +- (#151): 33...Tc7 34.Dxg8+ Kd7 35.Sd5 Tc2 36.Th7+ Kc6 37.Dc8+ Dc7 38.Txc7+ >>>>Kb5 39.Kxc2 a5 40.Dxb7# >>>>3. +- (#7): 33...De5 34.Dxg8+ Kd7 35.Th7+ De7 36.Txe7+ Kxe7 37.Dxc8 >>> >>>Harald, >>> >>>Can you proof your claim? >>> >>>Ed :) >> >>Sure. >>33...Lf7 34.Th8+ Ke7 35.Txc8 d5 36.Sxd5+ Kd6 37.Dxf7 De1+ 38.Tc1 Dc3 39.bxc3 b5 >>40.Dxa7 Kc6 41.Dc7# is #8, not #153 >> >>33...Tc7 34.Dxg8+ Kd7 35.Sd5 Tc2 36.Th7+ Kc6 37.Dc8+ Dc7 38.Txc7+ Kb5 39.Kxc2 a5 >>40.Dxb7# is #7, not #151. >> >>Do you count 151 or 153 moves in those mate lines? ;-))) > > >You did not give proof that there is no mate in 153! :) > > Christophe No, I gave only the proof that the given mating line is a mate in 8 and not a mate in 153 as Shredders eval suggests... ;) For the record: I don't consider this a serious bug. It is just a minor flaw the user should be aware of.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.