Author: Slater Wold
Date: 13:05:52 02/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2004 at 13:23:08, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On February 06, 2004 at 13:19:50, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On February 06, 2004 at 12:12:18, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>Well of course. If you could solve this, you could probably solve chess. >>> >>>When you do any kind of pruning, it's a trade off. That it will help in more >>>cases than it will hurt. >>> >>>I don't do any kind of pruning or null-move, YET, because of this. I want to >>>build my engine around how it evaluates positions, not around what it will never >>>see. (To explain better, I want a solid engine, with a good search & eval, and >>>doing the things I want/need, and THEN I will try things to speed it up such as >>>reductions & null-move, etc.) >> >>Hi Slate, >> >>I didn't know you had a program until just recently. How long have you been >>working on your program? How is it coming along? Tell us some about it. What >>language you're using, whether or not you chose one of the popular board >>representations, or whatever. And good luck! > >This is what happens when you operate a chess program in a tournament. Now that >he has been infected by the chess programming virus, it is all over for poor >Slate . . . . > >anthony You would be correct. ;) And since your engine appears to be so good, I'll be e-mailing you question after question! Don't worry, I wrote the verizon address down. :D
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.