Author: Slater Wold
Date: 13:25:36 02/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2004 at 16:21:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 15, 2004 at 16:20:48, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On February 15, 2004 at 16:10:55, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2004 at 15:45:02, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>My setup: >>>> >>>>AMD FX 51 >>>>Windows 2003 Enterprise (64 bit) >>>>Intel 8.0 Compiler >>>> >>>> >>>>Why would compiling Crafty 19.10 be 15% slower when defining /DVC_INLINE_ASM & >>>>/DUSE_ASSEMBLY? >>>> >>>>Has anyone else ever seen that? >>> >>>It may mean that the compiler generated better assembly than you did. >>> >>>It may also mean that you pulled in the wrong assembly. Old x86 assembly will >>>run on the AMD opteron type systems. It is the new stuff that will really be >>>snappy. >> >>ICC doesn't seem to like Bob's assembly code to start off with. >> >> >>vcinline.h(28): warning #1011: missing return statement at end of non-void funct >>ion "PopCnt" >> } >> ^ >> >>vcinline.h(41): warning #1011: missing return statement at end of non-void funct >>ion "FirstOne" >> } >> ^ >> >>vcinline.h(54): warning #1011: missing return statement at end of non-void funct >>ion "LastOne" >> } >> ^ > >Compiler bug. It does not recall that the return is stored in EAX. > >Print the rest of the routine that it is crying about. I am guessing it is >pulling in the wrong assembly. That's the only thing. I don't know enough about assembly to know what the hell is going on. :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.