Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:39:04 02/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2004 at 08:46:25, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>1)you did not make clear that part of your response is not against claims of Bob >>Hyatt when your first post was a reply to Hyatt's post. >> >>Bob Hyatt is not the person who started this subject so if you want to respond >>about the fact that we have no evidence to know that Crafty is stronger than >>Hydra then you should make clear that you do not respond to Hyatt's claim or not >>respond directly to hyatt's post. >> > >Uri, you are outdated. After the last Hyatt message, there is no problem with >him. Please, read carefully. > >>2)You are not the blind defender of Vincent like Russell suggested here >>but the fact that you only responded to nonsense that was not posted by vincent >>made that impression. > >I only replied to this subject "Crafty would Crush Hydra in tourney" in the >first message and other not important thing about Venezuela (nothing bad). >Again, read carefully. > > >> >>If you respond in that post about nonsense that Hyatt did not post, then you >>should also respond to nonsense that Vincent posted later, if you do not want >>people to think that you support vincent in this thread. >> >>Hyatt could reply in a slightly better way but I think that most people >>understood his message that was not:"Vincent has no right to talk because of not >>participating in CCT6" but: >>"By the logic of Vincent he has no right to talk because of not participating >>in CCT6" > >For the third time: Incorrect. I only commented one thing and I am not >interested in the personal decisions of Bob Hyatt. > >> >> >>3)No problem with making clear that there are justified reasons for you not to >>operate Diep in CCT6 but you should make clear that it is not a response against >>Hyatt because Hyatt did not claim that your reasons are unjustified. >> >>Hyatt's post was against Vincent's post and not against you and by the way that >>you responded people could get the impression that you support Vincent or think >>that Bob really blame you for not operating Diep in CCT6. >> >>Uri > >For the forth time: I only mentioned that I could not operate Diep for CCT6. I >said: it woulld be cool to have free time for that...... The rest of the >discussion of Diepeveen-Hyatt is not important for me. > >Are you goind to begin another argumentation about something that is clear? > >Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. No I only hope not to have this kind of discussions in the future. Making clear that you could not operate Diep is no problem. The problem is that the way that you expressed it caused people to get the wrong impression that you support vincent in the discussion(it is not only Russell that got the wrong impression). You could make things more clear by only adding one sentence in the start of the post that the post is not against claims of Bob Hyatt. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.