Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 06:45:23 02/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2004 at 09:39:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 21, 2004 at 08:46:25, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >> >>>1)you did not make clear that part of your response is not against claims of Bob >>>Hyatt when your first post was a reply to Hyatt's post. >>> >>>Bob Hyatt is not the person who started this subject so if you want to respond >>>about the fact that we have no evidence to know that Crafty is stronger than >>>Hydra then you should make clear that you do not respond to Hyatt's claim or not >>>respond directly to hyatt's post. >>> >> >>Uri, you are outdated. After the last Hyatt message, there is no problem with >>him. Please, read carefully. >> >>>2)You are not the blind defender of Vincent like Russell suggested here >>>but the fact that you only responded to nonsense that was not posted by vincent >>>made that impression. >> >>I only replied to this subject "Crafty would Crush Hydra in tourney" in the >>first message and other not important thing about Venezuela (nothing bad). >>Again, read carefully. >> >> >>> >>>If you respond in that post about nonsense that Hyatt did not post, then you >>>should also respond to nonsense that Vincent posted later, if you do not want >>>people to think that you support vincent in this thread. >>> >>>Hyatt could reply in a slightly better way but I think that most people >>>understood his message that was not:"Vincent has no right to talk because of not >>>participating in CCT6" but: >>>"By the logic of Vincent he has no right to talk because of not participating >>>in CCT6" >> >>For the third time: Incorrect. I only commented one thing and I am not >>interested in the personal decisions of Bob Hyatt. >> >>> >>> >>>3)No problem with making clear that there are justified reasons for you not to >>>operate Diep in CCT6 but you should make clear that it is not a response against >>>Hyatt because Hyatt did not claim that your reasons are unjustified. >>> >>>Hyatt's post was against Vincent's post and not against you and by the way that >>>you responded people could get the impression that you support Vincent or think >>>that Bob really blame you for not operating Diep in CCT6. >>> >>>Uri >> >>For the forth time: I only mentioned that I could not operate Diep for CCT6. I >>said: it woulld be cool to have free time for that...... The rest of the >>discussion of Diepeveen-Hyatt is not important for me. >> >>Are you goind to begin another argumentation about something that is clear? >> >>Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. > >No > >I only hope not to have this kind of discussions in the future. >Making clear that you could not operate Diep is no problem. > >The problem is that the way that you expressed it caused people to get the wrong >impression that you support vincent in the discussion What is wrong with supporting Vincent [or anybody else] in a discussion? Bob D. >(it is not only Russell >that got the wrong impression). > >You could make things more clear by only adding one sentence in the start of the >post that the post is not against claims of Bob Hyatt. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.