Author: Ed Panek
Date: 09:05:39 02/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2004 at 23:29:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 23, 2004 at 16:12:49, Ed Panek wrote: > >>On February 23, 2004 at 14:52:07, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 2004 at 11:26:38, Ed Panek wrote: >>> >>>>On February 23, 2004 at 11:09:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 23, 2004 at 10:45:47, Ed Panek wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I was wondering about trying something on ICC regarding playing a GM using >>>>>>multiple computers and choosing moves based upon plurality of several engines >>>>>>analyzing at once. >>>>>> >>>>>>Do you think this is feasable on ICC? >>>>>> >>>>>>I would front the $$ to obtain participation from the GM. >>>>>> >>>>>>Ed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You have to do it manually. IE you log on, and with 2-3 computers behind you, >>>>>you watch them and make the move of your choosing, then override the others so >>>>>that they maintain the correct position. >>>>> >>>>>Or you could use some sort of interface that lets you have different programs >>>>>log on using different accounts, and they "observe" your account playing the GM. >>>>> Then you can just watch their analysis and choose the move you like best, and >>>>>they get forced to play the right move and follow the game automatically. >>>>> >>>>>I'm not sure of the point in doing this, however.. >>>> >>>> >>>>It would be purely for entertainment value. It would not have to do with the >>>>move I like best, but the move which has the most consensus among the 4 or 5 >>>>programs. >>>> >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>Something tells me that in tactical positions, they will almost agree perfectly, >>>while in positional cases, each program will suggest a _different_ best move. >>> >>>:) >> >>What if I arranged a GM to play your 4 way opteron at standard times? Would you >>be open to that idea? >> >> >> >>Ed > >Perhaps, but it would take some preparation. IE I don't have a 4-way opteron at >the moment, that machine was out at AMD, and they put in a DSL connection for me >to access the machine. The DSL is gone. I could probably convince them to do >it again... Thats fine. If you can obtain the use of the 4 way again, I will take care of having a GM perform. Is that acceptable? Thanks, Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.