Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:10:25 02/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2004 at 12:05:39, Ed Panek wrote: >On February 23, 2004 at 23:29:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 23, 2004 at 16:12:49, Ed Panek wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 2004 at 14:52:07, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On February 23, 2004 at 11:26:38, Ed Panek wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 23, 2004 at 11:09:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 23, 2004 at 10:45:47, Ed Panek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was wondering about trying something on ICC regarding playing a GM using >>>>>>>multiple computers and choosing moves based upon plurality of several engines >>>>>>>analyzing at once. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Do you think this is feasable on ICC? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I would front the $$ to obtain participation from the GM. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Ed >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>You have to do it manually. IE you log on, and with 2-3 computers behind you, >>>>>>you watch them and make the move of your choosing, then override the others so >>>>>>that they maintain the correct position. >>>>>> >>>>>>Or you could use some sort of interface that lets you have different programs >>>>>>log on using different accounts, and they "observe" your account playing the GM. >>>>>> Then you can just watch their analysis and choose the move you like best, and >>>>>>they get forced to play the right move and follow the game automatically. >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm not sure of the point in doing this, however.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>It would be purely for entertainment value. It would not have to do with the >>>>>move I like best, but the move which has the most consensus among the 4 or 5 >>>>>programs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Ed >>>> >>>>Something tells me that in tactical positions, they will almost agree perfectly, >>>>while in positional cases, each program will suggest a _different_ best move. >>>> >>>>:) >>> >>>What if I arranged a GM to play your 4 way opteron at standard times? Would you >>>be open to that idea? >>> >>> >>> >>>Ed >> >>Perhaps, but it would take some preparation. IE I don't have a 4-way opteron at >>the moment, that machine was out at AMD, and they put in a DSL connection for me >>to access the machine. The DSL is gone. I could probably convince them to do >>it again... > >Thats fine. If you can obtain the use of the 4 way again, I will take care of >having a GM perform. Is that acceptable? > > > >Thanks, > >Ed Sure. Give me some sort of target time-frame to ask for...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.