Author: Aivaras Juzvikas
Date: 14:34:44 03/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2004 at 17:28:17, martin fierz wrote: >On March 23, 2004 at 17:13:46, Aivaras Juzvikas wrote: > >>On March 23, 2004 at 16:40:46, Renze Steenhuisen wrote: >> >>>On March 23, 2004 at 16:38:28, Aivaras Juzvikas wrote: >>> >>>>forgot to mention, i dont try null move on 0 ply >>> >>>Than what's your test set? >> >>test set?i just let two versions of my engine play each other a couple of 15 0 >>games, the result is either a draw or a win for the one w/o null move, even tho >>it searches deeper as i already mentioned > >"a couple" meaning...? > >if it's two games, forget it. if it's 10 games, forget it too. start believing >it when it's 100 games... > >cheers > martin well its 6 games, 4 draws, 2 losses, u r right it isnt enough, but all the ppl sayin that nullmove is such a magic thing are incorrect in my case, because if its really so good id get atleast some wins
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.