Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:31:35 03/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 24, 2004 at 16:53:08, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >The difference is more important and 10-0 is clearly more telling than 19-11 It is stronger, but less reliable. If it is true, then a dominant change may have been found. But the odds that it is true are not nearly so strong as the odds of 19-11 being true. Something about streaks: http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=118530 Do you remember the controversial Cadaques tournament? A big winning streak followed by an even bigger losing streak. If you took the first ten games, you will think it is dynamite. If you take the last ten games, you will think it is a dud.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.