Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:51:28 04/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2004 at 09:25:57, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>If Falcon cannot use parallel hardware then it is not bob's fault. > >I never tested Falcon versus Crafty on unequal hardware. All my tests and my >conclusions are purely based on tests conducted on equal hardware, using one >processor, and same book. > >In my post in this thread >(http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?362197) I only mentioned the >name "Crafty" in the following paragraph: > >"Crafty is a great engine, and it is free. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't >be interested in other grandmaster-strength programs." > >And added that Shredder is stronger than other engines. If someone read that >differently and jumped to interesting conclusions, it is surely not my problem. Actually it is. You _specifically_ said that only Shredder is capable of beating your program. That _specifically_ suggests that no other commercial engine can do so. That was what I responded to... I didn't bring Crafty into the discussion. Vincent did that in his usual "change the subject" form of discussion...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.