Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessmaster 10th Ed. YAWN!

Author: John Merlino

Date: 09:22:16 05/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 15, 2004 at 10:30:51, James T. Walker wrote:

>On May 14, 2004 at 21:11:54, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On May 14, 2004 at 20:30:24, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On May 14, 2004 at 20:01:50, John Merlino wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 14, 2004 at 19:19:18, Alex  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On May 14, 2004 at 17:16:03, John Merlino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On May 14, 2004 at 15:42:13, Terry Giles wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On May 14, 2004 at 15:07:54, John Merlino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Finally, there's something to see about the next version of Chessmaster
>>>>>>>>(apparently officially called "Chessmaster 10th Edition"):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.ubi.com/US/Games/chessmasterx_pc.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As expected (by me), the interface is entirely new, since the program is being
>>>>>>>>developed by the same team that did the PS2 version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>From what I can glean from the info on the website, it sounds like the majority
>>>>>>>>of the work has gone into redesigning the UI and improving the online play. I
>>>>>>>>don't see any new exciting tutorial/analysis features, other than Johan's new
>>>>>>>>version of The King.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So it sounds like they're going to sell the program based on the merits of the
>>>>>>>>new interface.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I also see a hint that there is an Xbox version in the works as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As for an official release date, there isn't one mentioned.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Enjoy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>jm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks for the info John, sad to say that all the screenshots shown are of
>>>>>>>'arty-farty' chesspieces and board combinations. I'm currently running CM9k on a
>>>>>>>PII @ 400Mhz, so unless I go for a major upgrade PC wise, the CM10th anniversary
>>>>>>>program will prove too demanding for my computer!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>tag
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yep, the min spec says P3-450, so I don't think this will be for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But I would definitely say it's time to upgrade, especially if you are a fan of
>>>>>>computer chess!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>jm
>>>>> Yah whatever!  Look--don't get me wrong......... I am a fan.  BUT!  let's face
>>>>>it -- the delivery in regard to online features and quality of chessmaster as
>>>>>historically presented and advertised is almost criminal in my opinion!  Yah --
>>>>>3d sets...I am with KURT U. on this one!  I ALWAYS actually play on 2d sets!
>>>>>Annnnnnnnnnnnnd........last but not least let's talk about engine.......is it
>>>>>reworked or is it JUST a new "personality setting"?  Alex
>>>>
>>>>To answer your comments:
>>>>
>>>>-- I almost always use the 2D sets, too. But many of the 3D sets are playable
>>>>(particularly the "flat" ones) and have the advantage that they can be resized
>>>>to any desired amount.
>>>>
>>>>-- The engine is new. It's got a new version number and everything -- just like
>>>>the engine in CM9000, which tests show is anywhere between 100-150 points
>>>>stronger than the previous version. Somehow I don't see that as "JUST a new
>>>>'personality setting'".
>>>>
>>>>jm
>>>
>>>Somehow I don't believe the "100-150 points stronger".  In the history of
>>>commercial computer chess I have never seen that big of a jump in rating at one
>>>time.  In fact the improvements in strength lately have been almost
>>>unrecognizable.  I am at the point of giving up on buying more chess programs
>>>and faster computers for a couple of years.  My blitz test show Fritz 8 is about
>>>11 points stronger than Fritz 7.  Big deal.  It seems that improvements in the
>>>opening book make it look stronger for a while untill book learning negates the
>>>new lines.  Then the real improvement shows itself.  Just my opinion of course.
>>>Jim
>>
>>The last upgrade for ChessMaster:
>>Chessmaster 8000  128MB K6-2 450 MHz    2520   44   -45   251   45%  2552
>>Chessmaster 9000  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2720   36   -36   376   55%  2682
>>
>>200 Elo increase.  How much was hardware?
>>
>>For Chess Tiger 14.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz  2640   23   -23   905   55%  2608
>>Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200   2719   30   -30   557   61%  2640
>>diff = 79 Elo
>>
>>For Chess Tiger 15.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Chess Tiger 15.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz    2666   34   -33   433   52%  2651
>>Chess Tiger 15.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2719   23   -22   983   58%  2659
>>diff = 53 Elo
>>
>>For Fritz 7.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Fritz 7.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz           2633   38   -37   348   53%  2611
>>Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz         2744   29   -28   634   63%  2653
>>diff = 111 Elo
>>
>>For Hiarcs 8.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Hiarcs 8.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2588   33   -34   440   42%  2648
>>Hiarcs 8.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz       2684   22   -22   996   53%  2663
>>diff = 96 Elo
>>
>>For Junior 7.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Junior 7.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2634   21   -21  1143   56%  2591
>>Junior 7.0  256MB  Athlon 1200 MHz      2702   24   -23   881   54%  2674
>>diff = 68 Elo
>>
>>For Rebel Century 4.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Rebel Century 4.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz   2569   52   -53   178   46%  2595
>>Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2677   29   -29   590   60%  2606
>>diff = 108 Elo
>>
>>For Shredder 6.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Shredder 6.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz     2618   43   -43   264   52%  2607
>>Shredder 6.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz     2723   31   -30   547   62%  2634
>>diff = 105 Elo
>>
>>For Shredder 7.0, same program on those two machines:
>>Shredder 7.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz     2772   27   -25   801   70%  2624
>>Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz     2699   34   -34   429   54%  2669
>>diff = 73 Elo
>>
>>Average Elo elevation for hardware change is:
>> (79 + 53 + 111 + 96 + 68 + 108 + 105 + 73)/8 = 693/8 = 87 Elo
>>
>>Therefore, 200 - 87 = 113 was the last increase for ChessMaster (approximately)
>>Hence, 100-150 Elo would be par for the course.
>
>Thanks for the stats Dann.  Do you know if CM9K was tested using original
>default settings or what?
>Jim

The SSDF tested the program with original settings EXCEPT a larger hash table
and increased selective search value (to 9, I believe). Other than that, it was
the default.

jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.