Author: Peter Berger
Date: 08:17:25 07/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2004 at 11:06:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 16, 2004 at 06:38:07, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On July 15, 2004 at 21:00:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On July 15, 2004 at 18:20:48, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>On July 15, 2004 at 14:50:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>No. It would be at least 10% faster. I have the actual comparison numbers from >>>>>the same version, one run by Eugene using his compiler, one run by me on linux >>>>>using 64 bit gcc. Eugene's compiler ate the gcc compiler for lunch. >>>> >>>>Before we go into all the other points I missed ;) - what operating system did >>>>the computer which ran Crafty compiled by Eugene use ? If the answer is Windows >>>>XP I stand corrected, but that would come as a surprise. >>> >>> >>>Windows XP. :) >>> >>>The O/S has no influence on Crafty's speed. IE windows XP is no faster or >>>slower than linux there. But Microsoft's compiler is far better than GCC. SO >>>it wins hands down. >> >>Eugene's answer was different :). > >Maybe we read different posts. :) He mentioned XP64 because you have to have >that to run the opteron in 64 bit mode, just as we used the Suse AMD64 linux >release for the same reason... OK - and that is where my 4.0 is coming from. Had Crafty run on Falcon's PC it would have been about 4 times slower than on the Quad Opteron. It was exactly four times slower on Ingo's PC e.g. I tried to explain this in previous posts, but maybe didn't make myself clear. Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.