Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:20:46 12/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2004 at 08:47:50, Steve B wrote: > > >> >> The brute force or the selective brute search algorithm?......Alan > >i assume you mean the Brute Force VS the Selectice search > >in general Brute force searchs are better in tactical positions and problems >while the normal Selective search is better for complete games > >this is true in general for all chess computers not just for the Saitek Brute >Force Module >Steve Sorry for my last empty message. I do not understand why? Is there a reason that brure force is better for tactics and selective search better for games. I found that more pruning did movei better in games and worse in test suites but I do not think that there should be some general rule that selective search is better for games. basically all programs are based on brute force+prunings and extensions and I do not understand what is brute force module and selective search module. if null move pruning is considered as selective search then it helps programs to be better in test suites. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.