Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:49:17 02/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2005 at 12:59:27, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On February 02, 2005 at 12:37:37, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>On February 02, 2005 at 10:43:37, gerold daniels wrote: >> >>>On February 02, 2005 at 08:37:02, Helmut Conrady wrote: >>> >>>>In the rating list of the German computer magazine "CSS Online" (10min+10sec, >>>>480 games/engine) Shredder 9 UCI (relaese: 7th Feb.) scored more than 30 elo >>>>better than its predecessor. Shredder 9 is rated now more than 80 elo points >>>>before the second, Fritz 8 Bilbao. >>>> >>>>Helmut >>> >>>when tony tests it than all will know how good the new shedder 9 is. >>> >>>gerold. >> >>When tony tests it, it'll be done on obsolete hardware, at one time control, >>with probably less than 1k games. Leave it to the online chess servers to test >>it :) >> >>When it has 5000 games it'll be ELO List Update, which will be a day or two >>after it comes out. >> >>Playchess.com does a great job, > >After one day you may have a couple of hundred, maybe thousand games at 3 0 at >playchess. Unfortunately this is completly worthless for Shredder! I tried there >with two different accounts (both S9). One is playing only games with an hour or >longer, the other run 2 nights only 3 to 5 min no increments. Both on the same >Hardware. The difference at the end was about 100 points. Of course the long >game account is much better! > >Bye >Ingo > >PS: Both account did not play versus other Shredders! I do not understand how do you compare between different time controls. You can say that you cannot learn from blitz about long time control but the knowledge if the new version is better at blitz is also an interesting information. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.