Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:48:42 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 1999 at 12:24:59, Howard Exner wrote: >>For IMs and GMs it should be easier to win because programs depend a lot on >>their opening books. Look what they play withoug opening book. For us patzers >>strong enough but masters know what and why they play... > >As we have moved away from the original topic I hope you don't >mind that I changed the thread name. My way of thinking about humans vs >computers at shuffle chess is different. Both are stripped of opening knowledge >but who will be more at home in the chaos of the shuffle chess position? >I liken it to composed problems. Computers treat these complex, weird looking >positions no differently than they do other more familiar positions as >those found in regular play. Humans on the other hand find such positions >disorienting. For humans our strength in chess is to a larger degree dependent >on pattern recognition and familiar themes. Computers while also >having chess knowledge are known more for their number crunching >skills.Therefore I think humans may suffer more from the chaotic shuffle chess >opening position. > > I'm not sure how popular this form of chess is for IM's >but if anyone has some games to share I'd be interested. I keep it. I tink that IMs and GMs have better understanding of positions and therefore better chances.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.