Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 21:00:23 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 21:59:47, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 19:26:31, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>The Official Table of teh Tournament says other thing. Your table is useless. > >It is not useless. It just states data that you don't support. Yes. It is _useless_ and manipulated. You dont have all the result neither all the games. Example: Patzer - Johnny, last round. > >The Offical Table shows Diep in 7th. That is 100% correct. I have never argued >that. > >>Really strange that the example is always directed to Diep in a particular style >>to "show" that it did not reach 2400 elo based on your assumptions. > >This thread was about Diep. I showed the performance rating based on the >opposition it faced. Nothing more. What is wrong with that? > >>Of course, I show with official result that yoour table is not useful. > >So I took the same official results, put them through the same process, and Diep >came out with a TPR of 2593. > >>The point is not the perfomance but your false eleventh place in the Table. > >It is not false. They are two totally different tables. > >One is the official tournament scoring table, and one is a TPR table based on >the pgn source from the games. I am not comparing one to the other. > If you have generated a Elo based on an incomplete pgn file, you have manipulated the data. I resturn you the strik 2+2 = 4. >Diep's TPR (Tournament Performance Rating) for the event was 11th overall. It >officially placed 7th. > >What is so hard to understand about this? > No, if people were idiot, people would accept your manipulated table. >Peter PD: Apart of the fact that your table is a...., your accusations about being Vincent Diepeveen show the real person that you are.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.