Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 18:59:47 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 19:26:31, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >The Official Table of teh Tournament says other thing. Your table is useless. It is not useless. It just states data that you don't support. The Offical Table shows Diep in 7th. That is 100% correct. I have never argued that. >Really strange that the example is always directed to Diep in a particular style >to "show" that it did not reach 2400 elo based on your assumptions. This thread was about Diep. I showed the performance rating based on the opposition it faced. Nothing more. What is wrong with that? >Of course, I show with official result that yoour table is not useful. So I took the same official results, put them through the same process, and Diep came out with a TPR of 2593. >The point is not the perfomance but your false eleventh place in the Table. It is not false. They are two totally different tables. One is the official tournament scoring table, and one is a TPR table based on the pgn source from the games. I am not comparing one to the other. Diep's TPR (Tournament Performance Rating) for the event was 11th overall. It officially placed 7th. What is so hard to understand about this? Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.