Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 16:26:31 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 18:29:23, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 18:12:48, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > > >>The typical Uri Blass.... If Peter made an assumption without the complete games >>and he put a 2400 elo as an initial value. It doesnt prove what a relative elo >>is. > >Diep played 9 rounds. There are 9 games in it's "performance" rating. I didn't >say what it's relative elo was. I simply stated that the average elo for the >tournament was around 2400, and Diep _performed_ under that. > >In PERFORMANCE it was 11th, in actual standings it was 7th. Tied with two >amateurs. The Official Table of teh Tournament says other thing. Your table is useless. >> >>Correction for the person who doesnt read: That is not my table. It is the >>official table of Paderborn, Mr. Blass. The Skinner´s Table puts Diep in the >>_11th_ place when it got the 7th. place. >> >>You simply dont see because you dont read. > >I read just fine, as can Uri. You obviously can't. I didn't state _anywhere_ >that was the official table. I said it was the performance rating table. > I showed official results while you showed a table that doesnt prove your point. >>The suggestion doesnt say anything about the range of 700elo points. > >>Knowing that Diepeveen and Skinner are not in harmony, the message might say >>other thing. I pointed out several links that proves the Diep´s overall is not >>under 2400 as it was said. I pointed out official results, not a personal table. > >Who cares what harmony me and Vincent are currently at. This was not personal. >It was showing the performance rating of a single program over a 9 round >tournament. Really strange that the example is always directed to Diep in a particular style to "show" that it did not reach 2400 elo based on your assumptions. > >You are the one that brought up the previous year's results. What do they have >to do with the performance at this year's IPCCC? Absolutely nothing. Only that I >was talking about one tournament, and you are trying to refute it with 4 >tournament results. Of course, I show with official result that yoour table is not useful. > >Are you sure you're not Vincent posting as Arturo? You sound the same. Nothing >but excuses and useless data to cloud the issue. > I am Arturo Ochoa, maybe you are Uri Blass?! :)))) Come on, such kind of accussations is really stupid. >>>He meant 2005. > >I meant one tournament. > > >>Because, you are alwaays in the area of suppositions and I dont know what the >>real sense of the table was, I just put the Diep performane in the current >>Tournament as well as over the year 2004. > >Who cares about last year? I was talking THIS YEAR'S EVENT. Can you simply not >accept this? I am not refuting or accepting anything, I am showing that your table is useless because The official Table of the Tournament shows other thing. >What are you trying to refute? Why bring up last year's data when it has >_nothing_ to do with this year's event? > >It performed worse than 4 amateurs. Are you sure Diep should be classified as a >"commercial"? > The point is not the perfomance but your false eleventh place in the Table. Arturo.-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.