Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 07:37:54 06/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2005 at 18:01:15, Peter Berger wrote: >On June 23, 2005 at 16:21:11, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>Unfortunately Computers handle the closed Ruy Lopez with white very strong as >>numerous examples have shown. >>The best strategies and plans for white are often easy to find for the machines. >>They are not subtle enough. >>There are also pawn pushes available to open the position or to strengthen the >>position. >> >>A strong machine plays this opening almost perfectly. > >I disagree , but this one has already been answered by Mr Smith with data. The problem with his data is he doesn't show the failure rate of these systems, much less the success rate of other systems. Here is a better set of data: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?433270 > > >> >>So I don´t agree. >>The Berlin Defence is a much more reasonable choice. >> > >Here I agree, although it has drawbacks of its own. But yes, given that the >structures when white avoid it belong to the group of openings Michael Adams >often plays into himself with the white pieces, I think it might have been a >good idea. > >I think that Adams probably planned to play for a win. > >It will be interesting to see what he chooses with his last black: the Marshall >is an interesting alternative IMHO. > >Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.