Author: Steve Glanzfeld
Date: 11:39:53 07/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2005 at 12:54:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >>And therefore, the games are vastly inferior in quality (as well as quantity). Vastly inferior? SSDF is testing 40/2h with 1200 MHz. CEGT is testing 40/40m with 2000 MHz. That is not much different in terms of CPU cycles per move. 1200 MHz*180=216 billion cpu cycles per move 2000 MHz* 60=120 billion cpu cycles per move So, the difference is smaller than 2:1 which means smaller than one ply. And of course, within the same time CEGT can provide a larger quantity of games than SSDF. Anyway, by now we know Fruit 2.1 is the 2nd best engine. Just watch out how long it takes before SSDF will come to that conclusion. Probably not before 2006. They didn't even manage to release a rating for Shredder 9 yet... :)) Steve
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.