Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength?

Author: Roger D Davis

Date: 20:28:08 07/18/05

Go up one level in this thread

On July 18, 2005 at 19:42:58, William Sorin wrote:

>Any more sceptics left?

I guess the surprise for me is that chess has turned out to be weighted much
further toward combinatorics than pattern recognition. So...search depth becomes
overwhelmingly important in engine strength.

I'm kind of looking for a game where pattern recognition is more important now.
Not sure what that would be.

Roger

• Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Dann Corbit 20:49:16 07/18/05
  • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Janosch Zwerensky 02:11:30 07/19/05
    • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? jefkaan 15:48:41 07/19/05
  • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Robin Smith 21:41:18 07/18/05
    • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Roberto Nerici 15:03:44 07/19/05
    • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Zheng Zhixian 07:12:56 07/19/05
  • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Graham Banks 20:57:35 07/18/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.