Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 20:49:16 07/18/05

Go up one level in this thread

On July 18, 2005 at 23:28:08, Roger D Davis wrote:

>On July 18, 2005 at 19:42:58, William Sorin wrote:
>
>>Any more sceptics left?
>
>I guess the surprise for me is that chess has turned out to be weighted much
>further toward combinatorics than pattern recognition. So...search depth becomes
>overwhelmingly important in engine strength.
>
>I'm kind of looking for a game where pattern recognition is more important now.
>Not sure what that would be.

Go

• Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Janosch Zwerensky 02:11:30 07/19/05
  • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? jefkaan 15:48:41 07/19/05
• Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Robin Smith 21:41:18 07/18/05
  • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Roberto Nerici 15:03:44 07/19/05
  • Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Zheng Zhixian 07:12:56 07/19/05
• Re: Who believes Programs are still not yet GM Strength? Graham Banks 20:57:35 07/18/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.