Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 15:48:47 09/09/05

Go up one level in this thread

Hmm, I conceded a point too early. You wrote at your site:

"In the short run (the next few years), dramatically swapping speed for
knowledge will make a program a little weaker (relevantly against other comps
and super-GMs) but more useful to the market if done well. That is the
sacrifice. If people are obsessed about comp-comp scores and which program is
thusly proved stronger, it makes progress in a more interesting area tougher."

Evidence for that statement other than ChessBase marketing blurb on Fritz 9?

I am ready to be convinced - how about only one single real example, Mig ?

• Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Mig Greengard 18:02:36 09/09/05
  • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Steve Glanzfeld 01:11:57 09/10/05
    • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Uri Blass 03:24:27 09/10/05
      • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Steve Glanzfeld 17:25:03 09/10/05
  • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Dann Corbit 19:17:06 09/09/05
    • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Thorsten Czub 00:20:34 09/10/05
      • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Zheng Zhixian 00:43:02 09/10/05
      • Re: Mig's article on 2005 WCCC, plus short interview with A. Cozzie Zheng Zhixian 00:42:57 09/10/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.