Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 06:40:48 11/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2005 at 09:25:39, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>Note that I had access to Fritz 9 evaluation during the game. > > If you looked at _your_ replies and that affected your decisions during the >game, then the game is of no value....... What do you mean by "looked at _your_ replies"?? I simply didn´t close the engine tab during the game since that certainly makes it a lot easier for me to exploit the weaknesses of the program. My goal was not to prove that I am stronger than Fritz, my goal was to prove that 2.Qh5 is a good move against computers. I am able to create a book based on 2.Qh5 which is simply a killer book for computer vs. computer. >>Of course Fritz will play different moves in a tournament game > >What do you mean by "tournament game".....? > >>but I am sure it >>would be a matter of some hours to figure out how to beat top engines almost >>always in tournament games with 2.Qh5 for me. > > If this is true, then you are stronger than computers and i'm 100% sure that >this is not true. And I am 100% sure you don´t have a clue what you are talking about. Michael So you should mean something else. What do you exactly mean? > > Saying that after 2.Qh5 that you can find how to beat all the time, all top >engines, means that: >1)2.Qh5 leads to a superior position for white >2)You are superior to computer top programs >3)Both 1) and 2) > >> >>Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.