Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 07:01:04 11/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2005 at 09:40:48, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On November 12, 2005 at 09:25:39, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>> >>>Note that I had access to Fritz 9 evaluation during the game. >> >> If you looked at _your_ replies and that affected your decisions during the >>game, then the game is of no value....... > >What do you mean by "looked at _your_ replies"?? >I simply didn´t close the engine tab during the game since that certainly makes >it a lot easier for me to exploit the weaknesses of the program. > >My goal was not to prove that I am stronger than Fritz, my goal was to prove >that 2.Qh5 is a good move against computers. 2.Qh5 is not a very wise choice for white from a theoretical point of view. Yet you can succeed in making such a killer 2.Qh5-book that will win most of the time against a today top engine. And this is because the today top engines don't have good answers to their book for 2.Qh5. But someone else can definitely make another anti-2.Qh5 book that would offer strong replies to 2.Qh5 and since 2.Qh5 is not the best opening for white, then your 2.Qh5-book would not be effective.......... >I am able to create a book based on 2.Qh5 which is simply a killer book for >computer vs. computer. Oh, now i understand.......You didn't play a normal game _alone_ against Fritz 9 and won with 2.Qh5, but you tried to find moves with whatever way (and that was by looking at Fritz's 9 evaluations), that would provide a win for white. That is clear now! > >>>Of course Fritz will play different moves in a tournament game >> >>What do you mean by "tournament game".....? >> >>>but I am sure it >>>would be a matter of some hours to figure out how to beat top engines almost >>>always in tournament games with 2.Qh5 for me. >> >> If this is true, then you are stronger than computers and i'm 100% sure that >>this is not true. > >And I am 100% sure you don´t have a clue what you are talking about. I had a clue, but i misunderstood what you've said. I thought you have played a normal game against Fritz 9 and won with 2.Qh5. But that was not the case.....It was an experiment to show that Fritz 9 with black can lose at 10'/game with 2.Qh5........ Also you claim that you can find a way that you can win all top engines by playing this.....By restricting this "all" only to Fruit, Shredder, Fritz, Junior, Hiarcs i think you will need around 7-8 months of continued analysis to be able to win almost always and at a certain time control......! > > >So you should mean something else. What do you exactly mean? >> >> Saying that after 2.Qh5 that you can find how to beat all the time, all top >>engines, means that: >>1)2.Qh5 leads to a superior position for white >>2)You are superior to computer top programs >>3)Both 1) and 2) >> >>> >>>Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.