Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Vas, ST is not so bad! (Wait !!!!!!)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:28:11 12/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On December 24, 2005 at 11:07:38, Albert Silver wrote:

>On December 24, 2005 at 10:00:44, Nolan Denson wrote:
>
>>While playing on playchess, I get my best results when playing with slightly
>>Tactical. At one point it played about 43 games in a row with no loses.  The
>>rating of the other accounts were from 2400-2900.  My rating got as high as 2860
>>using slightly tactical.  I am using a 3.73 EE processor.
>
>In my personal tests, ST had the clearly worst results compared to the other
>settings.
>
>                                        Albert

Note that it is logical to expect ST not to be the worst because if ST is worse
than SP then I expect also VT to be worse than ST.

It is the same as changing the value of the queen.

If you have 4 possible values 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 then it is not logical that 9.9
is worse both relative to 9.7 and relative to 10.1

If the 9.9 is worse than 9.7 then it means that the value of queen is smaller
than 9.9 and in this case 9.9 is certainly worse than 10.1

Uri
Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.