Author: Albert Silver
Date: 09:19:41 12/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 2005 at 11:28:11, Uri Blass wrote:
>On December 24, 2005 at 11:07:38, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On December 24, 2005 at 10:00:44, Nolan Denson wrote:
>>
>>>While playing on playchess, I get my best results when playing with slightly
>>>Tactical. At one point it played about 43 games in a row with no loses. The
>>>rating of the other accounts were from 2400-2900. My rating got as high as 2860
>>>using slightly tactical. I am using a 3.73 EE processor.
>>
>>In my personal tests, ST had the clearly worst results compared to the other
>>settings.
>>
>
>Note that it is logical to expect ST not to be the worst because if ST is worse
>than SP then I expect also VT to be worse than ST.
Well, I should have mentioned that I didn't test VT at all. I'll post the
results later. Got some last minute shopping to do. :-|
Albert
>
>It is the same as changing the value of the queen.
>
>If you have 4 possible values 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 then it is not logical that 9.9
>is worse both relative to 9.7 and relative to 10.1
>
>If the 9.9 is worse than 9.7 then it means that the value of queen is smaller
>than 9.9 and in this case 9.9 is certainly worse than 10.1
>
>Uri
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.