Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:41:56 12/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2005 at 08:37:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 30, 2005 at 08:19:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 30, 2005 at 08:11:49, Austin A. Biberink wrote: >> >>>On December 30, 2005 at 07:57:16, gerold daniels wrote: >>> >>>>Hello Tony.Thanks for your testing. Nice to see you are testing Fruit. >>> >>>Yes, but it would be even more nice to see that SSDF would be testing: >>> >>>1. the strongest freeware engine >>>2. the currently strongest engine >>> >>>(1.) = Toga II 1.1a >> >>It is not clear if the strongest freeware engine is TogaII1.1a or GambitFruit >> >>The CEGT rating list has >> >>9 Toga II 1.1 2767 15 15 1375 60.5 % 2693 36.9 % >>14 Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx 2740 26 26 468 52.4 % 2724 33.3 % >> >>The possible error is too small to know if TogaII 1.1 is better than Gambit >>Fruit1.0 Beta4bx in CEGT conditions and based on Ryan, Toga is probably weaker >>at long time control because of some change that is productive only at blitz and >>the SSDF use longer time control than the CEGT. > >Uhm, I'm not so sure. Error margins don't add linearly. From eyeballing, the >CEGT list gives >90% probability that Toga is stronger than Gambit Fruit. > >Where is the proof that "some change in Toga is only productive in blitz"? > >-- >GCP I do not know the proof because I did not learn the differences between Toga and Fruit2.1 but I trust Ryan about it. I plan to look at the source to find the differences between Fruit and Toga1.1 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.