Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results.

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 06:01:07 01/19/06

Go up one level in this thread

On January 19, 2006 at 08:45:23, Albert Silver wrote:

>>I think that if a program doesn't know not to repeat a losing line
>>then it deserves it's fate.
>
>There's only one problem: it isn't the engine's fault.
>
>                                Albert


You mean it's not the fault of the engine if it makes a decisive fault in a
chess game? I think this is a simple wordplay but it has no real value as a
verdict.

• Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. Albert Silver 06:41:39 01/19/06
  • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. Rolf Tueschen 06:49:21 01/19/06
    • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. Albert Silver 07:05:37 01/19/06
      • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. James T. Walker 12:35:17 01/19/06
        • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. Harvey Williamson 12:52:40 01/19/06
          • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. James T. Walker 13:32:43 01/19/06
            • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. Albert Silver 13:50:09 01/19/06
        • Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results. Harvey Williamson 12:49:08 01/19/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.