Author: Albert Silver
Date: 13:36:32 02/14/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2006 at 11:52:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On February 14, 2006 at 11:45:30, Duncan Roberts wrote:
>
>>On February 13, 2006 at 13:48:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>You are missing a major problem. Many professional engine authors have posted
>>>here, and answered questions, and the like. But you have _not_ seen them
>>>discussing marketing ideas, nor beta testing results, nor any of the other
>>>"behind-the-scenes" activities that go on the the life-cycle of a professional
>>>chess program.
>>>
>>>That's the difference here. The discussions ventured off into the "would you
>>>rather pay for a single copy or a subscription to multiple updates?" and so
>>>forth, which _clearly_ do not belong here.
>>>
>>>That's that part of this that has gone over the top. All the games played by
>>>Rybka are fine. I can skip 'em if I am not interested, but they are about
>>>computer chess.
>>
>>changing the subject slightly, I would value your opinion on Rybka. Is it as
>>good as people say it is. ? any comments generally about its strength.
>>
>>
>>duncan
>
>I'm really the wrong one to ask. Crafty has been on ICC sporadically the last
>few weeks, because of the offline testing I've been doing. So I have not had
>the opportunity to watch very many games to develop an opinion about what Rybka
>is doing better than everyone else...
>
>Eventually I will start looking at ICC games and then perhaps will begin to see
>what sort of "trends" I notice.
It won't take many games to spot a few glaring ones. IMHO.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.