Author: Ryan B.
Date: 19:25:44 02/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2006 at 21:55:05, Charles Wane wrote: >I just got finished playing a four game match at game/30 min between Hiarcs 10 >and Rykba 13d, Hiarcs had an Athlon64 3200 with 128mb hash, against Rykba >running on a Pent II 450 with 128mb hash. The score was 2-2 !! Yesterday I >played about 14 games between rykba running on the same 450 against Deep fritz 8 >on the Athlon64 and rykba won the majority of the games!! Iv'e never seen a >program with such inferior hardware play so strong. I actually rated rybka on >the 450 on chessmaster 10th but letting rybka play the various personalities it >ended up with a rating of 3055!! And lost only one game , running all on a mere >Pent II 450. I guess Rybka's case the chess knowledge means much more then the >speed of the program? I don't know cause I'm not a computer chess expert, but >all this seems bizarre. From what I have seen Rybka has great knowledge but not in the way of traditional chess knowledge by having a huge evaluation function. Like all chess engines I expect Rybka to play better on faster hardware but I so far think the gain of fast hardware is less than most other programs. From what I see Rybka ranks higher in blitz than long tc games. This is at least the case on the CEGT rating list. Ryan
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.