Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: comp vs comp or comp vs human ... but why not comp vs cc players?

Author: Robert Ericsson

Date: 04:07:16 04/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On April 26, 1999 at 04:49:17, Harald Faber wrote:

>On April 23, 1999 at 11:33:08, Robert Ericsson wrote:

[snip]

>>That's why I use 'watch' command in Fritz and
>>not cc analysis feature when looking through my own played games :-D
>
>And what do you do if you want an alternative move suggestion, based on the
>position?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean? When using 'watch' command I can
see what Fritz thinks is the best way to go. And of course I look at other
interesting moves that there suggested in the post-mortem by me our by my
opponent.

I don't save these analysis in data format (cbh/pgn) as I'm very fond of
writing these lines down right on my score sheet :-)


>
>>>Allow the cc player to check his ideas with a program and he will crush the
>>>opponent program.
>>
>>I'm not so sure. Maybe if the cc player have an ICCF-ELO >2500 but not
>>otherwise.
>
>I am sure 2200-2300 is enough.
>
>>Hmm... clarification: if comp uses 40 moves in 2 hours and cc player can
>>think much longer it's true. With equal time I don't think so.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.