Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: comp vs comp or comp vs human ... but why not comp vs cc players?

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 01:49:17 04/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On April 23, 1999 at 11:33:08, Robert Ericsson wrote:

>>>There seem to be two statements made out of this article:
>>>1) comp-comp tournaments (for instance SSDF games) can be tweaked with
>>>   different/special opening books. At least that's what the comp-human
>>>   people argues. >>  SSDF's list is not 'showing the truth'
>>>
>>>2) comp-human tournaments are better as they will give a true FIDE-ELO
>>>   where the programs have performed (good or bad) against humans in OTB
>>>   (over the board) tournaments.  >>  More 'accurate' ELO list
>>>
>>>But hey, wait a minute!? Why is statement 2 so much better then 1?
>>
>>Easy: Because comp-comp in most cases is playing without a (reasonable) plan.
>
>Yes, but performance rating of the comp. is very much biased by the fact
>that OTB players blunder or overlook tactical sequences a lot (or even loose
>on time).

That is the pity. If we wuldn't do it we'd perform much better. It is
disappointing how often a well played game is thrown away by only one bad move.

>>That is correct, on the other hand humans do have a better positional
>>understanding, especially when there is no tactics around.
>
>Certainly true but tactics are always lurking around ;-)

I know, >95% of chess is tactics. Or what do you think why is Fritz so
dangerous? ;-)
Certainly not because he knows much about chess....

>>Programs have become strong opponents especially OTB. But my experience is that
>>for analysis you can't leave them analyzing on their own. It still needs some
>>brain for the right ideas.
>
>And that's certainly true! That's why I use 'watch' command in Fritz and
>not cc analysis feature when looking through my own played games :-D

And what do you do if you want an alternative move suggestion, based on the
position?

>>Allow the cc player to check his ideas with a program and he will crush the
>>opponent program.
>
>I'm not so sure. Maybe if the cc player have an ICCF-ELO >2500 but not
>otherwise.

I am sure 2200-2300 is enough.

>Hmm... clarification: if comp uses 40 moves in 2 hours and cc player can
>think much longer it's true. With equal time I don't think so.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.