Author: Paul Richards
Date: 12:37:44 06/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 1999 at 13:46:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I don't disagree at all. I would personally vote for such a proposal in an >instant. If you want to be anonymous, you can read, but not write. If you >want to write, you have to come out from under the rock where everyone can see >you and where you can be held accountable for what you write. Actually my idea was that anonymity for reading be prohibited also, otherwise the playing field is not level. But it's very difficult to generate a truly "approved list" of people without killing traffic to the site, which is not in anyone's interest. >The only ones that will have problems with that are the ones that want to >stay hidden, of course. But I won't object to simply adding hotmail.com to >the hosts.deny file (among lots of others, of course, and I would do >t-online.de if it were my host. :) ) Well I use Hotmail myself, but I could rattle off a dozen others I could use at the drop of a hat. T-online.de is the host of the Mr. Faber, who suggested this whole thing. :)))) And Mr. Singleton resides on that ultimate haven of abuse, AOL. Free != abuse.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.