Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 2265 Uscf Master Trashes Hiarcs 6.0!!! ???

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:17:46 06/25/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 25, 1999 at 03:18:48, odell hall wrote:

>Hi CCC
>
>
>  I have Started a six game match at game/60 between a friend of mine who is
>rated uscf 2265 and hiarcs 6. My machine is a cyrix 233 with 16mb ram. My
>purpose for having the match is I wanted to see how my program would fair
>against a mid level master.  I have to admitt I am pretty astonished at the
>result of game one.  I assumed that hiarcs would slaughter a master rated only
>2265. Unfortunatley the master one rather easily.  He made some mistakes that
>allowed hiarcs to come back at a later stage of the game. It then reached a draw
>bishops of opposite color endgame which is miserably mishandled to lose the
>game.  56. Bxg4???  was the losing move for hiarcs. It also played quite lousy
>in the opening it made time wasting queen moves at 17. Qg3?   20.Qf3?? when Rc1
>was called for. This game was a real disappointed , I had been bragging to my
>friend about how well hiarcs plays positionally and how great it's endgame is.
>Here is the game.
>

This is the point I have tried to explain to you several times. What "GM"
would lose such a game to a 2200 player?  Can you think of one?  I see _all_
programs lose to such players on ICC.  Some repeatedly to humans that are
not even 'titled' by FIDE.  And so long as this continues, I have a _hard_
time thinking of the programs as "GM" players...

IMHO of course...





>
>[Event "Game/60 game1"]
>[Site
>[Date "1997.12.17"]
>[Round "1
>[White "Hiarcs6 Cyrix233 16m"]
>[Black "Richard uscf master"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[WhiteElo "2520"]
>[BlackElo "2265"]
>[ECO "C02"]
>
>1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. c3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Qb6 6. a3 Bd7 7. b4 cxd4 8.
>cxd4 Rc8 9. Be2 a5 10. b5 Nxd4 11. Nxd4 Rxc1 12. Qxc1 Qxd4 13. Nd2 Qxe5
>14. Nf3 Qb8 15. Qc3 b6 16. Ne5 Nf6 17. Qg3 g6 18. Qc3 Bg7 19. Nxd7 Kxd7
>20. Qf3 Ke7 21. Rc1 Ne4 22. Qe3 Rc8 23. Rxc8 Qxc8 24. O-O Qc5 25. Qxc5+
>Nxc5 26. Rb1 Bd4 27. Bf3 Kd6 28. Kf1 f5 29. h4 e5 30. Rd1 Na4 31. Rc1 Bc5
>32. Bd1 Nb2 33. a4 Nd3 34. Rc2 e4 35. h5 g5 36. h6 Ne5 37. Rd2 f4 38. Bc2
>Ke6 39. Bb3 Nd3 40. f3 Ke5 41. fxe4 dxe4 42. Bg8 Bf8 43. Bxh7 Bxh6 44.
>Rxd3 exd3 45. Bxd3 Kd4 46. Bc2 Ke3 47. Bd1 Bf8 48. Ke1 Bb4+ 49. Kf1 Kd2
>50. Bf3 Bc5 51. Bg4 Be3 52. Be2 Kc3 53. Bd1 Kb4 54. Ke2 g4 55. Kd3 Bc5
>56. Bxg4 Kxa4 57. Ke4 Kxb5 58. Kxf4 a4 59. Be6 Kb4 60. g4 Kc3 61. g5 a3
>62. Ke4 b5 63. g6 Bf8 64. Kf5 b4 { White resigns } 0-1



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.