Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 18:24:43 08/31/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 1999 at 03:38:43, Harald Faber wrote: >On August 30, 1999 at 20:01:45, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>On August 30, 1999 at 15:55:57, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>Having read the post and seeing there was a wife bashing comment used as a >>metaphor, thus resulting in a deletion of the post I find a bit stupid. If it >>was meant as no harm. But today there are people who want to take things to the >>extreme. I would say that 99.9% of people on here would never hit their wives >>and if there is 0.1% then even if reading that post somehow in there wacky minds >>thought wow hitting my wife is right, well I do not think so. >> >>That is the problem escpecially from people who want to go on religious crusades >>to save our souls. And ones that want to portray a perfect goodness image. >> >>Either way the second coming of Christ as told in the book of revelations is >>coming soon and I think that is should be left to God to judge this comment as >>we are incapable or doing so ourselves. As clearly shown by the for and against >>in this thread > >1) Message deletion is also done to prevent escalation. >2) Again it is you complaining about moderation. I suggest you to go for >moderator and make it better. I have made no strong comments about current moderation. I would not go for moderator cause then I too would be picked on. I do not have all the answers, it will always be 50/50. But in this case I think it is 99.9% in favour of the post staying. 0.1% to get rid of it. I know lets have a poll, we need a new one anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.