Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: Who are we to Judge

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 06:26:19 09/01/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 31, 1999 at 21:24:43, Micheal Cummings wrote:

>On August 31, 1999 at 03:38:43, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On August 30, 1999 at 20:01:45, Micheal Cummings wrote:
>>
>>>On August 30, 1999 at 15:55:57, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>>
>>>Having read the post and seeing there was a wife bashing comment used as a
>>>metaphor, thus resulting in a deletion of the post I find a bit stupid. If it
>>>was meant as no harm. But today there are people who want to take things to the
>>>extreme. I would say that 99.9% of people on here would never hit their wives
>>>and if there is 0.1% then even if reading that post somehow in there wacky minds
>>>thought wow hitting my wife is right, well I do not think so.
>>>
>>>That is the problem escpecially from people who want to go on religious crusades
>>>to save our souls. And ones that want to portray a perfect goodness image.
>>>
>>>Either way the second coming of Christ as told in the book of revelations is
>>>coming soon and I think that is should be left to God to judge this comment as
>>>we are incapable or doing so ourselves. As clearly shown by the for and against
>>>in this thread
>>
>>1) Message deletion is also done to prevent escalation.
>>2) Again it is you complaining about moderation. I suggest you to go for
>>moderator and make it better.
>
>I have made no strong comments about current moderation. I would not go for
>moderator cause then I too would be picked on.

This is not very brave but easy to slam instead of being slammed.
Typical for nowadays, everyone complaining but almost none there with engagement
to try to make it better.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.