Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CSTal 2 vs. Hiarcs 7.32, 17 games, cheating of autoplayer !!

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 15:25:52 09/02/99

Go up one level in this thread


what you can see from your games is not how strong
the autoplayer is, but



O.k., here we go:game/60', 2 * Cyrix/IBM 6x86MX PR-300
                 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1   Hiarcs 7.32  ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1  13.0/17
2   CSTal II     ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   4.0/17

the series shows how the chessbase autoplayers is doing it.

if you would have played the games each game with a reset
pc, without autoplayer cable, your >10.game results would
more like the first 10 games result.

in fact your result exactly shows what we always said and talk
about, but we have no evidence HOW they do it.
i am sure ed knows HOW they do it. therefore next rebel century
comes WITH autoplayer and new learning algorithm.

ONE more thing: the cyrix cpu is not very fast.
This hurts cstal, since cstal does many times less NPS than hiarcs.
also 60/60 is not that good, 40/120 would be better.






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.