Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs7.32 vs. CSTal2.03, 6th game

Author: blass uri

Date: 04:33:15 09/17/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 17, 1999 at 02:39:51, Bertil Eklund wrote:

>On September 17, 1999 at 00:51:49, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On September 17, 1999 at 00:16:19, Will Singleton wrote:
>>
>>>Thorsten,
>>>
>>>I'm a bit confused (as usual).  How it is that cstal beats hiarcs in your games,
>>>yet plays about on the same level as my program on ICC on equal hardware?
>>>
>>>Will
>>
>>The games are different from ICC games because ICC games are not tournament time
>>control.
>>
>>I am also interested to know if there is a problem with the hardware because I
>>know about mistakes that hiarcs did in the past that could not be reproduced
>>(these mistakes happened when hiarcs did not use the pentium)
>>and one mistake is enough to lose the game.
>>
>>Uri
>Hello!
>
>IMO H7.32 is about 200 elo stronger on Intel and probably a bit less on AMD.
>
>Bertil SSDF

I have 2 questions about Hiarcs7.32

1)Do you see bad results for Hiarcs7.32 in the ssdf games with the new hardware
level because of the fact that you use AMD and not Intel?

2)Do you see bad results for Hiarcs7.32 because of the bad opening book of
Hiarcs7.32?

I will not be surprised if Hiarcs7 will have better result in the ssdf games
relative to Hiarcs7.32 because I know that Hiarcs7's book does not have the same
blunders as the Hiarcs7.32's book.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.