Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:25:25 09/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 1999 at 04:40:27, blass uri wrote: >On September 27, 1999 at 02:43:06, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Heh, heh. Hiarcs7.32 should have been totally in it's own class, but SSDF tells >>the truth again! Single computer engine-engine play doesn't tell much yet... >>And Fritz 6 is much stronger. >> >>Jouni > >The problem with hiarcs7.32 is the book and it is more important when you use >fast hardware. > >SSDF says nothing about Hiarcs7.32 with a better book. > >SSDF says gives CM6000 better rating than Fritz5.32 on the same hardware so it >is not clear if they say Fritz5.32 is number 1. > >The ssdf says that Fritz5.32(K6-450) did not play a big number of games and the >rating of it may be changed so it is not clear if Fritz5.32 is really number 1. > >I expect the rating of Fritz5.32 to go down in the future when it plays against >better opponents. > >Uri I'd expect Fritz at least to keep the rating because of the excellent booklearning function.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.